4.7 Article

Polyethyleneimine-reinforced Sn/Cu foam dendritic self-supporting catalytic cathode for CO2 reduction to HCOOH

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134704

关键词

Electrochemical reduction of CO2; Electrodeposition; Tin-on-Cu foam; Polyethyleneimine; Formate

资金

  1. Beijing Forestry University Outstanding Young Talent Cultivation Project [2019JQ03007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52070015, 21872009]
  3. Beijing Municipal Education Commission through the Innovative Transdisciplinary Program Ecological Restoration Engineering [GJJXK210102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel catalytic cathode of PEI-Sn/Cu foam with dendritic structure was prepared for electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to HCOOH, showing high efficiency and stability. The results provide a promising strategy for developing efficient catalysts for CO2 electroreduction.
In this work, a novel catalytic cathode of polyethyleneimine (PEI)-Sn/Cu foam with dendritic structure was prepared by electrodeposition and impregnation. It was used in the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to HCOOH, and its performance in this process was evaluated. At -0.97 V vs. RHE, the faradaic efficiency and current density reached 92.3% and 57.1 mA cm(-2), respectively, in a 0.5 M KHCO3 electrolyte. The HCOOH production rate reached 890.4 mu mol h(-1) cm(-2), which exceeds those for most reported Sn catalysts. Density functional theory calculations showed that use of Sn/Cu foam is more conducive to HCOOH formation than use of Cu or Sn alone, and *OCHO is the main intermediate in HCOOH formation. The results of OH- adsorption experiments confirmed that the introduction of PEI enhanced the catalytic capacity of the Sn/Cu foam, stabilized CO2 center dot- intermediates, and promoted HCOOH generation. These results will provide an attractive strategy for developing efficient catalysts with excellent activities and stabilities for CO2 electroreduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据