4.7 Article

Abiotic degradation behavior of polyacrylonitrile-based material filled with a composite of TiO2 and g-C3N4 under solar illumination

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 299, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134375

关键词

Plastic pollution; Abiotic degradation; PAN; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51133006and 51103133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a photocatalytic additive with high activity by compounding non-toxic TiO2 and cost-effective g-C3N4, and incorporated it into PAN to prepare a photodegradable PAN material. The results showed that the PAN chain could be almost fully degraded within 90 hours under simulated sunlight in the absence of microorganisms. The degradation mechanism involved the breaking of bonds by radicals and subsequent oxidation. This design strategy may provide new insights for the production and degradation mechanism of photodegradable polymers.
As some of the most promising alternatives to traditional non-degradable materials, photodegradable materials have advantages of environmental benignity and rapid degradation under simple conditions. In this work, nontoxic TiO2 and cost-effective g-C3N4 have been compounded in a weight of 9:1 to form a photocatalytic additive with high activity. A 25 wt% loading of this photocatalytic additive has been incorporated into the polyacrylonitrile (PAN) by centrifugal electrospinning to prepare an abiotic degradable PAN material. Our results showed that the PAN chain could be almost fully degraded within 90 h in an aqueous medium under simulated sunlight in the absence of microorganisms. Product analysis implied that degradation of the PAN chain mainly involved the breaking of -CN and C-C bonds by radicals, followed by oxidation of terminal groups to carboxyl and gradual mineralization to CO2 and H2O. This design strategy may provide new insight for the production and degradation mechanism of photodegradable polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据