4.6 Article

Toughened Hydrogels for 3D Printing of Soft Auxetic Structures

期刊

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.202200677

关键词

Biomedical hydrogels; Cellulose nanocrystals; Macro-cross-linkers; Auxetic materials; Toughening

资金

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) of Singapore [SC25/21-110915]
  2. A*STAR IMRE - SCG Chemicals Advanced Composite Joint Lab (IAF-ICP Project) [I1801E0024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports on the use of methacrylated cellulose nanocrystals as a macro-cross-linking agent in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels for 3D printing of auxetic structures. The developed hydrogels exhibit significant improvements in mechanical properties and stretchability compared to traditional hydrogels.
Materials with negative Poisson's ratio have attracted considerable attention and offered high potential applications as biomedical devices due to their ability to expand in every direction when stretched. Although negative Poisson's ratio has been obtained in various base materials such as metals and polymers, there are very limited works on hydrogels due to their intrinsic brittleness. Herein, we report the use of methacrylated cellulose nanocrystals (CNCMAs) as a macro-cross-linking agent in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) hydrogels for 3D printing of auxetic structures. Our developed CNCMA-pHEMA hydrogels exhibit significant improvements in mechanical properties, which is attributed to the coexistence of multiple chemical and physical interactions between the pHEMA and CNCMAs. Structures printed by using CNCMA-pHEMA hydrogels show auxetic behavior with greatly enhanced toughness and stretchability compared to the hydrogel with a traditional cross-linking agent. Such strong and tough auxetic hydrogels would contribute toward establishing advanced flexible implantable devices such as biodegradable oesophageal self-expandable stents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据