4.8 Article

Complete Perovskite Solar Cells with Gold Electrodes Studied in the Visible and Near-Infrared Ranges

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 14, 页码 6355-6366

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00845

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DI2016 001946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, solar cells with triple-cation perovskite were investigated using femtosecond transient absorption and steady-state absorption techniques. The results showed that the gold electrode influences the perovskite response and the kinetics at the interface. The analysis of transient absorption spectra provides insights into the interface processes.
Complete solar cells with the triple-cation perovskite (FA0.76MA0.19Cs0.05Pb(I0.81Br0.19)3) sandwiched between spiro-OMefluorene) and mesoporous titania layers were examined using femtosecond transient absorption (TA) and steady-state absorption in the visible and near-infrared (NIR) regions. We demonstrate in this paper that the transmission spectroscopic measurements through a gold layer are possible and open the way to investigate the solar cells in working conditions (with applied voltage and/or additional illumination). We show that a gold electrode does not exhibit a significant TA signal itself but causes a difference in the perovskite response at around 800 nm and in the NIR range. The irradiation with a femtosecond laser, 1 Sun stationary illumination, or applied voltage causes significant changes in the TA spectra and kinetics at the TiO2 interface, most probably due to ion segregation or ion rearrangement process. The transmission signal in the NIR range is shown to be dominated by spectral modulation due to light interference; however, the process of hole injection at spiro-OMeTAD interfaces can be extracted. Finally, application of an appropriate forward bias enables the suppression of electron and hole injection to contact materials and results in increased lifetime of charge population in the perovskite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据