4.8 Article

Biomechanically Compatible Hydrogel Bioprosthetic Valves

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01300

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a big step towards biomechanically compatible hydrogel heart valves using RAFT-3D printing technology. These valves have favorable mechanical properties, long-term stability, and durability due to their wide and robust hydrogen-bonding networks. They also exhibit excellent biocompatibility and hemocompatibility. The hydrogel valves efficiently regulate blood flow and can withstand high levels of pressure.
Bioprosthetic cardiac valves are efficient replacements to clinically treat the valvular heart diseases including stenosis and regurgitation, while these often suffer from the issues of mechanical mismatch, biocompatibility, thrombus, degradation, etc. Here, we report a big step toward the biomechanically compatible hydrogel heart valves by the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization compatible threedimensional (RAFT-3D) printing tough hydrogels. The biocompatible hydrogel valves have favorable mechanical properties matching with native valves and long-term stability and durability owing to the wide and robust hydrogen-bonding networks, on which the heparin-like polymer with -SO3- is readily grafted through RAFT polymerization, endowing outstanding hemocompatibility including low hemolysis, anticoagulation, and acceptable inflammatory response. The proof-of-concept hydrogel aortic valve displayed a low transvalvular pressure gradient of 14-24 mmHg, which efficiently regulates the flow direction and regurgitation and, more importantly, endures a cyclic pressure of similar to 80 mmHg for at least 1.8 x 10(5) cycles yet maintaining a stable transvalvular pressure gradient without any damage to the configuration and performance. It is believed that the engineered hydrogel cardiac valves pave a significant way toward addressing the complications of cardiovascular diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据