4.5 Review

An Overview on Synthetic and Medicinal Perspectives of [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine Scaffold

期刊

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202200291

关键词

[1; 2; 4]triazolo[1; 5-a]pyrimidine; synthetic strategies; anti-infectious agents; agrochemicals; anti-cancer agents; CNS agents; SAR studies

资金

  1. Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) [RM27]
  2. National Research Foundation-South Africa (NRF-ZA) [145946, 129247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine is an important heterocyclic scaffold known for its broad range of pharmacological activities, and several marketed drugs have demonstrated its potential in medicinal chemistry. This review provides an overview of the synthetic strategies and pharmacological applications of differently substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine, with a focus on structure-activity relationship studies.
[1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine is an important heterocyclic scaffold known to have a wide range of pharmacological activities such as anticancer, antimicrobial, anti-tubercular, CB2 cannabinoid agonists, feticide, and adenosine antagonists. Several clinical trials and marketed drugs such as Trapidil, Essramycin, Pyroxsulam, DSM-265, Flumetsulam, GNF-6702, and Cevipabulin indicate the potential of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine moiety with various functional groups in medicinal chemistry. Herein, we represent a concise report focusing on the synthetic strategies used for diversely substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine analogs and their pharmacological applications. To the best of our knowledge, since 1980, we are the first to write a review on this emerging scaffold, which reveals the synthetic strategies, and pharmacological activities of differently substituted [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine with special emphasis on structure-activity relationship studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据