4.7 Article

Radiation shielding and structural features for different perovskites doped YBa2Cu3Oy composites

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 13, 页码 18855-18865

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.162

关键词

Perovskite ceramic; Radiation shielding; X-ray diffraction; Gamma; Neutron; Charged particles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the structure and properties of ceramic materials doped with perovskite oxides for use in radiation shielding. Experimental results show that these ceramic materials have different structures and shielding properties, indicating their potential for use as shielding materials.
The increased demand for ionizing radiation in various fields led to the search for new shielding substances. In this study, five samples of perovskite oxides (BaTiO3, SrTiO3, BaTiO3-SrTiO3, and PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3) doped YBa2-Cu3Oy ceramics were prepared to explore their structure and ability for exploitation in the radiation shielding field. The structural properties were explored by using the XRD technique. The XRD results showed an orthorhombic structure for all prepared ceramics. The crystallite size reduces gradually from 96.19 to 66.63 nm with adding different perovskite oxides into the composites. The density shows a variation from about 5.89 to 6.23 g/cm(3). The mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) was defined experimentally (MAC)(exp) and theoretically (MAC)the to check its validity. The maximum relative difference between (MAC)(exp) and (MAC)(the) is 7.83%. YBa2Cu3O7/(PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3)(2%) and YBa2Cu3O7/(BaTiO3-SrTiO3)(2%) samples showed superior gamma shielding properties and mass stopping power (MSP) for charged particles, respectively, while the pristine YBa2Cu3O7 sample has a better fast neutron removal cross-section (sigma(R)). From the obtained results, it can be seen a slight variation in shielding properties, indicating the ability to use the different ceramic samples as radiation shielding materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据