4.7 Article

First-principles investigation of equilibrium phase, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of the Nowotny TM5Si3C ternary phase

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 14, 页码 20438-20445

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.329

关键词

Nowotny phase (NP); Equilibrium structure; Ductility; First-principle calculations

资金

  1. Graduates Research and Innovation Fund Project of Southwest Petroleum Univer-sity [2020CXZD20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the structural stability, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties of TM5Si3C Nowotny phase using first-principles calculations. It is found that the four TM5Si3C ternary phases exhibit high thermal stability and good ductility, which is related to the vibration of the C atom in the system.
Although the TM-Si-C ternary compounds are potential high-temperature ceramics, the equilibrium phase, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of Nowotny phase (NP) are still unclear. Here, the structural stability, mechanical and thermodynamic properties of the TM5Si3C Nowotny phase (NP) are studied by the first-principles calcualtions. Four TM5Si3C ternary phases (TM = Mo, Nb, W and Ta) are considered. It is found that the equilibrium structure of the Nowotny phase (NP) is a TM5Si3C. In particular, the Mo5Si3C, Nb5Si3C, W5Si3C and Ta5Si3C are firstly predicted. Nb5Si3C has better thermodynamic stability in comparison to the other TM5Si3C. Furthermore, the calculated elastic properties show that four TM5Si3C not only exhibit similar strength in comparison to the corresponding TM5Si3 and TMSi2, but also show better ductility compared to the corresponding TM-Si binary silicides. The nature of mechanical properties of TM5Si3C is revealed by the electronic structure and difference charge density. In addition, it is further found that four TM5Si3C have high melting points and excellent thermodynamic stability. Naturally, the better thermodynamic properties of TM5Si3C is related to the vibration of C atom in a system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据