4.7 Article

In-situ growth of TiO2 nanoparticles on crumpled Ti3C2Tx with negative permittivity for electromagnetic interference shielding

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 21, 页码 32427-32435

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.188

关键词

Crumpled morphology; Partial oxidation; Negative permittivity; Electromagnetic interference shielding; TiO2

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation in Shandong Province
  2. [ZR2021ME194]
  3. [ZR2020ME039]
  4. [ZR2020ME134]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes in-situ growth of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface of Ti3C2Tx MXene to create TiO2/MXene heterointerfaces, improving the absorption characteristics of the material and enhancing its electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Additionally, the material exhibits negative permittivity, contributing to a reflection-dominant shielding mechanism.
MXenes have been attracting enormous attention owning to their high electronic conductivity, abundant func-tional groups, and surface modification ability in the application of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding. In this work, TiO2 nanoparticles were in-situ grown on the surface of crumpled Ti3C2Tx MXene to generate TiO2/ MXene heterointerfaces and create an extra absorption path. It was found that Ti3C2Tx with less oxidation time generated more TiO2. This intriguing phenomenon was caused by the fact that more functional groups escaped in the pre-oxidation step, creating extra active sites and allowing for more intense oxidation in a shorter period. Besides, the hybrid showed negative permittivity due to the metal-like conduction behavior, contributing to the reflection-dominant shielding mechanism. The TiO2/MXene heterostructure with negative permittivity exhibited an excellent total EMI shielding effectiveness of 73.98 dB at a filler content of 25 wt% in 8.0-12.4 GHz (covering the X band) at 2 mm. This work offers a new insight into exploring the structure-property relationship for MXene-based materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据