4.7 Review

Mechanical properties of sugar palm lignocellulosic fibre reinforced polymer composites: a review

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 6493-6516

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04695-3

关键词

Sugar palm fibre; Thermoplastic; Thermoset; Mechanical properties; Biocomposites

资金

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) [PP/LESTARI/2022, XX-2021-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reduction in petroleum resources and increased global environmental awareness have led to the acceptance of natural fibres as green materials. Lignocellulosic fibre-reinforced polymer biocomposites, such as sugar palm fibres, have gained attention for their sustainable nature and wide availability. This review focuses on the mechanical behavior of sugar palm lignocellulosic fibre biocomposites, providing a valuable source of literature for further research in construction and building materials.
The significant reduction in petroleum resources and the growth of global environmental awareness on the use of conventional plastics are the motivating factors to accept natural fibres as green materials. Lignocellulosic fibre-reinforced polymer biocomposites have attracted considerable attention from engineers and researchers because of their sustainable nature and wide availability. Sugar palm is an emerging crop grown in Malaysia and Indonesia and is regarded as a significant candidate lignocellulosic fibre in biocomposites. Sugar palm fibres are mainly made up of cellulose, which leads to outstanding mechanical properties. From a literature review, no comprehensive review paper has been published on the mechanical behaviour of sugar palm lignocellulosic fibre biocomposites to provide a good source of literature for doing further research on this topic to consider them construction and building materials. The present review concentrates on recent work on the properties of sugar palm lignocellulosic fibres, starches, and nanofillers and their fabrication as biocomposites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据