4.7 Review

Mitofusins: from mitochondria to fertility

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04386-z

关键词

Mitofusin; Mitochondria; Fertility; Germ cell formation; Embryonic development; Reproductive diseases

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32102549, 31872984]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution [2019-YWF-YB-03]
  3. National Key R&D Program of Ningxia [2021BEF02023]
  4. Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System of the PR China [CARS36]
  5. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of mitochondrial fusion regulators is essential for germ cell formation, embryonic development, and the occurrence of reproductive diseases.
Germ cell formation and embryonic development require ATP synthesized by mitochondria. The dynamic system of the mitochondria, and in particular, the fusion of mitochondria, are essential for the generation of energy. Mitofusin1 and mitofusin2, the homologues of Fuzzy onions in yeast and Drosophila, are critical regulators of mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells. Since their discovery mitofusins (Mfns) have been the source of significant interest as key influencers of mitochondrial dynamics, including membrane fusion, mitochondrial distribution, and the interaction with other organelles. Emerging evidence has revealed significant insight into the role of Mfns in germ cell formation and embryonic development, as well as the high incidence of reproductive diseases such as asthenospermia, polycystic ovary syndrome, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Here, we describe the key mechanisms of Mfns in mitochondrial dynamics, focusing particularly on the role of Mfns in the regulation of mammalian fertility, including spermatogenesis, oocyte maturation, and embryonic development. We also highlight the role of Mfns in certain diseases associated with the reproductive system and their potential as therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据