4.7 Article

Non-protective immune imprint underlies failure of Staphylococcus aureus IsdB vaccine

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1163-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.06.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01AI127406, R01AI144694]
  2. NIGMS [R35 GM119850]
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF20SA0066621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural exposure to Staphylococcus aureus (SA) may explain the failure of anti-SA immunization trials. Animals infected with SA do not mount protective antibody responses to vaccination, unlike naive animals.
Humans frequently encounter Staphylococcus aureus (SA) throughout life. Animal studies have yielded SA candidate vaccines, yet all human SA vaccine trials have failed. One notable vaccine failure targeted IsdB, critical for host iron acquisition. We explored a fundamental difference between humans and laboratory animals-natural SA exposure. Recapitulating the failed phase III IsdB vaccine trial, mice previously infected with SA do not mount protective antibody responses to vaccination, unlike naive animals. Non-protective antibodies exhibit increased alpha 2,3 sialylation that blunts opsonophagocytosis and preferentially targets a non-protective IsdB domain. IsdB vaccination of SA-infected mice recalls non-neutralizing humoral responses, further reducing vaccine efficacy through direct antibody competition. IsdB vaccine interference was overcome by immunization against the IsdB heme-binding domain. Purified human IsdB-specific antibodies also blunt IsdB passive immunization, and additional SA vaccines are susceptible to SA pre-exposure. Thus, failed anti-SA immunization trials could be explained by non-protective imprint from prior host-SA interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据