4.8 Article

Parkinson's disease-risk protein TMEM175 is a proton-activated proton channel in lysosomes

期刊

CELL
卷 185, 期 13, 页码 2292-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [RO1-DK115474]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R35-GM131720]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta Region Green Pharmaceuticals
  4. University of Michigan Mcubed and PFD disease initiative grants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease, TMEM175, acts as a proton-activated, proton-selective channel on the lysosomal membrane to regulate lysosomal H+ leak. Activation of TMEM175 stops further acidification of lysosomes beyond the normal range. Deficiency of TMEM175 causes lysosomal over-acidification, impaired proteolytic activity, and facilitates alpha-synuclein aggregation.
Lysosomes require an acidic lumen between pH 4.5 and 5.0 for effective digestion of macromolecules. This pH optimum is maintained by proton influx produced by the V-ATPase and efflux through an unidentified H+ leak pathway. Here we show that TMEM1 75, a genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD), mediates the lysosomal H+ leak by acting as a proton-activated, proton-selective channel on the lysosomal membrane (LyPAP). Acidification beyond the normal range potently activated LyPAP to terminate further acidification of lysosomes. An endogenous polyunsaturated fatty acid and synthetic agonists also activated TMEM175 to trigger lysosomal proton release. TMEM175 deficiency caused lysosomal over-acidification, impaired proteolytic activity, and facilitated alpha-synuclein aggregation in vivo. Mutational and pH normalization analyses indicated that the channel's H+ conductance is essential for normal lysosome function. Thus, modulation of LyPAP by cellular cues may dynamically tune the pH optima of endosomes and lysosomes to regulate lysosomal degradation and PD pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据