4.8 Article

BacPROTACs mediate targeted protein degradation in bacteria

期刊

CELL
卷 185, 期 13, 页码 2338-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [694978]
  2. FFG Headquarter Grant [852936]
  3. Vienna Science and Technology Fund [WWTF LS17-029]
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [694978] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully reprogrammed the bacterial protein degradation machinery using small-molecule degraders called BacPROTACs. BacPROTACs not only targeted the substrate receptor but also activated ClpC to unfold protein substrates. The in vivo activity of BacPROTACs was demonstrated in mycobacteria, making it a promising tool for both antibiotic discovery and inducible bacterial protein degradation.
Hijacking the cellular protein degradation system offers unique opportunities for drug discovery, as exemplified by proteolysis-targeting chimeras. Despite their great promise for medical chemistry, so far, it has not been possible to reprogram the bacterial degradation machinery to interfere with microbial infections. Here, we develop small-molecule degraders, so-called BacPROTACs, that bind to the substrate receptor of the ClpC:ClpP protease, priming neo-substrates for degradation. In addition to their targeting function, BacPROTACs activate ClpC, transforming the resting unfoldase into its functional state. The induced higher-order oligomer was visualized by cryo-EM analysis, providing a structural snapshot of activated ClpC unfolding a protein substrate. Finally, drug susceptibility and degradation assays performed in mycobacteria demonstrate in vivo activity of BacPROTACs, allowing selective targeting of endogenous proteins via fusion to an established degron. In addition to guiding antibiotic discovery, the BacPROTAC technology presents a versatile research tool enabling the inducible degradation of bacterial proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据