4.8 Article

MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 18, 页码 3394-3404

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1329

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RR160005]
  2. CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research
  3. Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences at The University of Texas at Austin
  4. MD Anderson Cancer Center
  5. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program
  6. NIH [U01CA142565, U01CA174706, U24CA226110]
  7. Texas Advanced Computing Center
  8. Novartis
  9. Medivation/Pfizer
  10. Genentech
  11. GSK
  12. EMD-Serono
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Medim-mun
  15. Zenith
  16. Merch
  17. Speaker's Bureau for MedLearning
  18. Physician's Education Resource
  19. Prime Oncology
  20. Medscape
  21. Clinical Care Options
  22. Medpage
  23. UpToDate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully predicts the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant systemic therapy using MRI data and mathematical modeling, providing highly accurate predictions of therapeutic efficacy.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is persistently refractory to therapy, and methods to improve targeting and evaluation of responses to therapy in this disease are needed. Here, we integrate quantitative MRI data with biologically based mathematical modeling to accurately predict the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) on an individual basis. Specifically, 56 patients with TNBC enrolled in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443) underwent standard-of-care doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (A/C) and then paclitaxel for NAST, where dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI were acquired before treatment and after two and four cycles of A/C. A biologically based model was established to characterize tumor cell movement, proliferation, and treatment -induced cell death. Two evaluation frameworks were investigated using: (i) images acquired before and after two cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting tumor status after A/C, and (ii) images acquired before, after two cycles, and after four cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting response following NAST. For Framework 1, the concordance correlation coefficients between the predicted and measured patient-specific, post-A/C changes in tumor cellularity and volume were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. For Framework 2, the biologically based model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.89 (sensitivity/specificity 1/4 0.72/0.95) for differentiating pathological complete response (pCR) from non-pCR, which is statistically superior (P < 0.05) to the value of 0.78 (sensitivity/ specificity 1/4 0.72/0.79) achieved by tumor volume measured after four cycles of A/C. Overall, this model successfully captured patient -specific, spatiotemporal dynamics of TNBC response to NAST, providing highly accurate predictions of NAST response. Significance: Integrating MRI data with biologically based math-ematical modeling successfully predicts breast cancer response to chemotherapy, suggesting digital twins could facilitate a para-digm shift from simply assessing response to predicting and optimizing therapeutic efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据