4.7 Article

Helicobacter pylori infection induces stem cell-like properties in Correa cascade of gastric cancer

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215764

关键词

Cancer stem cell; Microenvironment remodeling; Epithelial -mesenchymal transition

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the pathogenic mechanisms by which H. pylori induces gastric stem cell-like properties and CSCs, and supplements the existing Correa model. H. pylori infection leads to dysfunction of developmental signaling pathways and alteration of gastric mucosal microenvironment, potentially promoting gastric stem cell-like properties through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Its poor prognosis is attributed to unclear pathogenesis. Currently, the most widely accepted model for elucidating the mechanism of GC is the Correa cascade, which covers several histological lesions of the gastric mucosa. GC stem cells (CSCs) are crucial for oncogenesis in the Correa cascade and GC progression. As Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the etiological factor in the Correa cascade, growing evidence suggests that enhancement of gastric stem cell-like properties and increase in CSCs correlate with H. pylori infection. In this paper, we review recent studies that present pathogenic mechanisms by which H. pylori induces gastric stem cell-like properties and CSCs, which may supplement the existing Correa model of GC. First, the dysfunction of developmental signaling pathways associated with H. pylori infection leads to the enhancement of gastric stemness. Second, H. pylori infection promotes alteration of the gastric mucosal microenvironment. In addition, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may contribute to H. pylori -induced gastric stemness. Taken together, understanding these pathogeneses will provide potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of CSCs and malignant GC in H. pylori induced-Correa cascade of GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据