4.7 Article

Acidosis significantly alters immune checkpoint expression profiles of T cells from oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 55-71

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03228-y

关键词

A2aR; Acidosis; Lactate; Immune checkpoints; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Tie-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumour acidosis inhibits anti-tumour immunity and affects the profiles of T cells in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) can enhance anti-tumour T cell immunity under acidosis. Lactate is linked to metastasis.
Tumour acidosis contributes to cancer progression by inhibiting anti-tumour immunity. However, the effect of acidosis on anti-tumour T cell phenotypes in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of acidosis on anti-tumour T cell profiles and if immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) could enhance anti-tumour T cell immunity under acidosis. Acidic conditions substantially altered immune checkpoint expression profiles of OAC patient-derived T cells, upregulating TIM-3, LAG-3 and CTLA-4. Severe acidosis (pH 5.5) significantly decreased the percentage of central memory CD4(+) T cells, an effect that was attenuated by ICB treatment. ICB increased T cell production of IFN-gamma under moderate acidosis (pH 6.6) but not severe acidosis (pH 5.5) and decreased IL-10 production by T cells under severe acidic conditions only. A link between lactate and metastasis was also depicted; patients with nodal metastasis had higher serum lactate levels (p = 0.07) which also positively correlated with circulating levels of pro-angiogenic factor Tie-2. Our findings establish that acidosis-induced upregulation of immune checkpoints on T cells may potentially contribute to immune evasion and disease progression in OAC. However, acidic conditions curtailed ICB efficacy, supporting a rationale for utilizing systemic oral buffers to neutralize tumour acidity to improve ICB efficacy. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据