4.3 Article

Risk of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix among US women with potential exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1121-1124

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01598-3

关键词

Diethylstilbestrol; DES; Gynecologic cancer; Cancer registries; Prenatal exposure; Cancer surveillance

资金

  1. Cyberdata Technologies, Inc. [HHSN31620120007W 200-2017-F94805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that women exposed to DES in utero have an elevated risk of developing CCA in midlife and at older ages. These results underscore the importance of understanding the cancer risk among DES daughters and providing appropriate screening guidance.
Purpose Women exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES) in utero were at elevated risk of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix (CCA) as young women. Previous research suggested that this elevated risk of CCA may persist into adulthood. We extended a published analysis to measure CCA risk as these women aged. Methods Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) compared CCA risk among women born from 1947 through 1971 (the DES-era) to CCA risk among the comparison group of women born prior to 1947, using registry data that covered the US population. Results Incidence rates of CCA among both cohorts increased with age. Among the DES-era birth cohort, higher rates of CCA were observed across all age groups except 55-59 years. SIR estimates had wide confidence intervals that often included the null value. Conclusions Results are consistent with prior research and suggest an elevated risk of CCA in midlife and at older ages among women exposed in utero to DES. These results highlight unresolved issues regarding cancer risk among aging DES daughters and appropriate screening guidance. The examination of population-based cancer surveillance data may be a useful tool for monitoring trends in the incidence of other rare cancers over time among specific birth cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据