4.7 Review

Laboratory development of subaerial biofilms commonly found on buildings. A methodological review

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109451

关键词

Buildings; Biodeterioration; Methodologies; Subaerial biofilms formation

资金

  1. Xunta de Galicia [CGL2016-79778-R, BES- 2017-079927]
  2. [ED431 2018/32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of biodeterioration of building materials is hindered by the difficulty of accessing and sampling protected buildings. Therefore, there is a recognized need to develop a laboratory mesocosm that accurately represents nature and allows for the study and analysis of both the substrate and the organisms involved. Currently, there is a lack of consensus in the methods and protocols used in studying the formation of biofilms on building materials, which makes it difficult to compare results. This review aims to identify different methods reported in the scientific literature and organize them according to different factors, providing a guide for selecting the most appropriate methods based on different objectives.
Study of the biodeterioration of building materials is often hampered by the inaccessibility of the colonization and impossibility of sampling in protected buildings considered part of the cultural heritage. There is therefore a recognised need to develop a laboratory mesocosm that realistically represents nature and enables the study and analysis of both the substrate and the organisms involved. Although many studies have investigated the for-mation of biofilms on various building materials, there is a lack of homogeneity and consensus in the methods and protocols used, which hampers comparison of the results obtained. This review aims to identify the different methods reported in the scientific literature, to organise these according to different factors (water access and types of organism and substrata used) and thus provide the research community with a guide for selecting the most appropriate methods according to the different objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据