4.6 Article

Paradoxical reactions and biologic agents: a French cohort study of 9303 patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 187, 期 5, 页码 676-683

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21716

关键词

-

资金

  1. GEM Resopso group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of paradoxical reactions during biologic therapy and identify risk factors. The likelihood of paradoxical reactions was found to be associated with inflammatory bowel disease and a combination of at least two inflammatory diseases. Adding conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or corticosteroid therapy may reduce the risk of paradoxical reactions for high-risk patients.
Background Paradoxical reactions (PRs) are defined as the occurrence during biologic therapy of a pathological condition that usually responds to these drugs. Objectives To estimate the incidence of PRs and identify risk factors. Methods Multicentre study of the database for the Greater Paris University Hospitals, including biologic-naive patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha, anti-interleukin-12/23, anti-interleukin-17 or anti-alpha 4 beta 7-integrin agents for psoriasis, inflammatory rheumatism or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We used natural language processing algorithms to extract data. A cohort and a case-control study nested in the cohort with controls selected by incidence density sampling was used to identify risk factors. Results Most of the 9303 included patients (median age 43 center dot 0, 53 center dot 8% women) presented an IBD (3773, 40 center dot 6%) or a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (3708, 39 center dot 9%), and 8489 (91 center dot 3%) received anti-TNF-alpha agents. A total of 297 (3 center dot 2%) had a PR. The global incidence rate was 7 center dot 6 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6 center dot 8-8 center dot 5]. The likelihood of PR was associated with IBD [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1 center dot 9, 95% CI 1 center dot 1-3 center dot 2, P = 0 center dot 021] and a combination of at least two inflammatory diseases (aOR 6 center dot 1, 95% CI 3 center dot 6-10 center dot 6, P < 0 center dot 001) and was reduced with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and corticosteroids (aOR 0 center dot 6, 95% CI 0 center dot 4-0 center dot 8, P = 0 center dot 002; and OR 0 center dot 4, 95% CI 0 center dot 2-0 center dot 6, P = 0 center dot 002, respectively). Conclusions The likelihood of PRs was associated with IBD or a combination of a least two inflammatory diseases. More studies are needed to assess the benefit of systematically adding csDMARDs for such high-risk patients. What is already known about this topic? Most published studies about paradoxical reactions concern paradoxical psoriasis in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha agents. Few data are available for other paradoxical reactions and the most recent biologics. What does this study add? Risk of paradoxical reactions was increased with inflammatory bowel disease and a combination of at least two inflammatory diseases. Risk of paradoxical reactions was reduced with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or corticosteroid therapy, which could be added for high-risk patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据