4.7 Article

Interpretable surface-based detection of focal cortical dysplasias: a Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection study

期刊

BRAIN
卷 145, 期 11, 页码 3859-3871

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac224

关键词

focal cortical dysplasia; epilepsy; structural MRI; machine learning

资金

  1. Rosetrees Trust [A2665]
  2. NIHR GOSH BRC
  3. Wellcome Trust [218380, 215901/Z/19/Z]
  4. CNF/PERF Shields Award
  5. CNRI Chief Research Officer Award
  6. Hess Foundation
  7. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/07559-3]
  8. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Royal Society [206675/Z/17/Z]
  9. Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London [MR/N026063/1]
  10. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82071457]
  11. MRC [G0802012, MR/MR00841X/1]
  12. Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC [EP/N510129/1]
  13. NIH [R01 NS109439]
  14. Tuscany Region Call for Health 2018 (grant DECODE-EE)
  15. NIHR
  16. GOSH Children's Charity Surgeon-Scientist Fellowship
  17. BRAIN Unit Infrastructure Award [UA05]
  18. Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales
  19. Saastamoinen Foundation
  20. NHMRC [APP1176426]
  21. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Wellcome Trust [206675/Z/17/Z]
  22. Wellcome Trust [215901/Z/19/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the challenges in applying machine learning to diagnostic biomedical imaging is the interpretability of algorithms. This study developed an open-source and interpretable machine-learning algorithm to automatically identify FCDs from structural MRI data, improving the confidence of physicians in identifying subtle MRI lesions in individuals with epilepsy.
One outstanding challenge for machine learning in diagnostic biomedical imaging is algorithm interpretability. A key application is the identification of subtle epileptogenic focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) from structural MRI. FCDs are difficult to visualize on structural MRI but are often amenable to surgical resection. We aimed to develop an open-source, interpretable, surface-based machine-learning algorithm to automatically identify FCDs on heterogeneous structural MRI data from epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project collated and harmonized a retrospective MRI cohort of 1015 participants, 618 patients with focal FCD-related epilepsy and 397 controls, from 22 epilepsy centres worldwide. We created a neural network for FCD detection based on 33 surface-based features. The network was trained and cross-validated on 50% of the total cohort and tested on the remaining 50% as well as on 2 independent test sites. Multidimensional feature analysis and integrated gradient saliencies were used to interrogate network performance. Our pipeline outputs individual patient reports, which identify the location of predicted lesions, alongside their imaging features and relative saliency to the classifier. On a restricted 'gold-standard' subcohort of seizure-free patients with FCD type IIB who had T-1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI data, the MELD FCD surface-based algorithm had a sensitivity of 85%. Across the entire withheld test cohort the sensitivity was 59% and specificity was 54%. After including a border zone around lesions, to account for uncertainty around the borders of manually delineated lesion masks, the sensitivity was 67%. This multicentre, multinational study with open access protocols and code has developed a robust and interpretable machine-learning algorithm for automated detection of focal cortical dysplasias, giving physicians greater confidence in the identification of subtle MRI lesions in individuals with epilepsy. Spitzer et al. present a robust and interpretable open-source machine-learning algorithm for automated detection of focal cortical dysplasias. The pipeline outputs individual patient reports, which identify the location of predicted lesions, alongside their imaging features and relative saliency to the classifier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据