4.4 Article

Development, Diversity and Dynamics of Plant Architecture in Utricularia subgenus Polypompholyx - Towards Understanding Evolutionary Processes in the Lentibulariaceae

期刊

BOTANICAL REVIEW
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 201-236

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12229-022-09283-5

关键词

Carnivorous plants; Lentibulariaceae; Polypompholyx; Process morphology; Seedling development; Stolon; Utricularia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the nature of different types of stolons in Utricularia subgenus Polypompholyx through scanning electron microscopy, as well as statistically analyzed the correlations between stolon types and other traits across 56 species. The results showed that stolon types were taxonomically relevant and correlated to the distribution/climate, and they diverged with speciation events in Australia. Additionally, the study found that seedlings of Genlisea and Polypompholyx exhibited similar developmental patterns.
To uncover the nature of various kinds of stolons of Utricularia subgenus Polypompholyx (Lentibulariaceae) we studied branching of stolons by scanning electron microscopy, statistically investigated correlations of stolon types and other traits across 56 species, and evaluated seedling development and process morphological aspects. Some results were compared to the sister genera Pinguicula and Genlisea. A key to nine stolon types in Polypompholyx is provided. Predominant stolon types were rhizoids, runner stolons with rhizoids on nodes, and runner stolons without rhizoids on nodes but with bladders on internodes. Stolon types were taxonomically relevant and correlated to the distribution/climate. They obviously diverged with speciation events in Australia. Examined seedlings of Genlisea and Polypompholyx showed similar developmental patterns. Stolons were homologous to traps and leaves. Selected subterranean organs contained specific but similar process combinations of roots, shoots and/or leaves. We assume the Genlisea-Utricularia ancestor trap included processes of a Pinguicula root and leaf.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据