4.4 Article

Translation and initial validation of Chinese (Cantonese) version of Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-C) in people with stroke

期刊

BMC NEUROLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02832-w

关键词

Chronic stroke; Stroke rehabilitation; Fatigue; Modified fatigue impact scale

资金

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [P0013897]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The MFIS-C showed satisfactory content validity and good to excellent internal consistency. Overall, the MFIS-C and its subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability. The findings indicate that people with chronic stroke in Hong Kong experience high levels of fatigue.
Purpose To translate and culturally adapt the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) to Chinese version, and to psychometrically test it in stroke population. Methods This study consisted of 2 phases. In phase one, we translated and culturally adopted the original English version of MFIS into Chinese (Cantonese) (MFIS-C). In phase two, the MFIS was psychometrically tested using a cohort of community-dwelling people with stroke (n = 101) and healthy control (n = 50). Among the stroke participants, 52 of them were reassessed after a 1-week interval. Results The MFIS-C demonstrated satisfactory content validity and good to excellent internal consistency. The overall MFIS-C and its subscales have good test-retest reliability. The MDC95 were 14.86, 7.49, and 9.70 for the overall MFIS-C physical, cognitive and psychosocial subscales, respectively. The overall MFIS-C and its 2 subscales have significant weak to moderate negative correlations with the Community Integration Measure and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Version 2. Our findings revealed that the people with chronic stroke living in Hong Kong were reported to have high level of fatigue. Conclusion The MFIS-C is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the level of fatigue in people with stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据