4.5 Article

LZTR1 molecular genetic overlap with clinical implications for Noonan syndrome and schwannomatosis

期刊

BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-022-01304-x

关键词

Noonan syndrome; Neurofibromas; Whole exome sequencing; LZTR1

资金

  1. Bhalwani Family Charitable Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviews the contribution of LZTR1 in Noonan syndrome and describes a patient with a novel mutation in the LZTR1 gene. The patient, initially diagnosed with clinical NS, was found to have plexiform neurofibromas on brain and spine MRI, but did not meet the criteria for Neurofibromatosis type 1.
Background Noonan syndrome (NS) is a genetic disorder characterized by developmental delays, typical facial gestalt and cardiovascular defects. LZTR1 variants have been recently described in patients with NS and schwannomatosis, but the association, inheritance pattern and management strategy has not been fully elucidated. Here, we review the contribution of LZTR1 in NS and describe a patient with a novel, likely pathogenic variant in LZTR1. Case presentation A female patient was diagnosed with clinical NS at 8 months of age. She presented in adulthood when a brain and spine MRI identified plexiform neurofibromas; however, she did not meet the clinical criteria for Neurofibromatosis type 1. No pathogenic variants were identified through molecular genetic analysis of NF1, SPRED1 and a multigene NS panel. Whole exome sequencing at age 23 identified a novel de novo likely pathogenic heterozygous variant in the LZTR1 gene denoted as c.743G>A (p.Gly248Glu). Serial MRIs have shown stable imaging findings and the patient is being followed clinically by cardiology, neurology and medical genetics. Conclusions We identified a novel mutation in the LZTR1 gene, not previously reported in association with NS. This report provides additional evidence to support for the assessment of schwannomatosis in patients with LZTR1-NS and may have overlap with Neurofibromatosis type 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据