4.7 Article

Reduced-Intensity Transplantation for Lymphomas Using Haploidentical Related Donors Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donors: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 34, 期 26, 页码 3141-+

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3476

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [U24-CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5U10HL069294]
  5. Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH250201200016C]
  6. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0039, N00014-14-1-0028]
  7. Actinium Pharmaceuticals
  8. Allos Therapeutics
  9. Amgen
  10. National Cancer Institute
  11. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  12. Celgene Corporation
  13. Chimerix, Inc
  14. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  15. Fresenius-Biotech North America
  16. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture
  17. Genentech
  18. Gentium SpA
  19. Genzyme Corporation
  20. GlaxoSmithKline
  21. Health Research, Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  22. HistoGenetics
  23. Incyte Corporation
  24. Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation
  25. Kiadis Pharma
  26. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  27. Medac
  28. Medical College of Wisconsin
  29. Merck Co
  30. Millennium: Takeda Oncology
  31. Milliman USA
  32. Miltenyi Biotec
  33. National Marrow Donor Program
  34. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  35. Optum Healthcare Solutions
  36. Osiris Therapeutics
  37. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
  38. Perkin Elmer
  39. Remedy Informatics
  40. Sanofi US
  41. Seattle Genetics
  42. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  43. Soligenix
  44. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  45. StemCyte
  46. Global Cord Blood Therapeutics
  47. Stemsoft Software
  48. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  49. Tarix Pharmaceuticals
  50. TerumoBCT
  51. Teva Neuroscience
  52. THERAKOS
  53. University of Minnesota
  54. University of Utah
  55. Wellpoint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is increasingly used in patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). We compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT using PT-Cy with MSD-HCT in patients with lymphoma, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Materials and Methods We evaluated 987 adult patients undergoing either Haplo-HCT (n = 180) or MSD-HCT (n = 807) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The haploidentical group received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PT-Cy with or without a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. The MSD group received calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis. Results Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 28-day neutrophil recovery was similar in the two groups (95% v 97%; P = .31). The 28-day platelet recovery was delayed in the haploidentical group compared with the MSD group (63% v 91%; P = .001). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar between the two groups (27% v 25%; P = .84). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was significantly lower after Haplo-HCT (12% v 45%; P < .001), and this benefit was confirmed on multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31; P < .001). For Haplo-HCT v MSD-HCT, 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (15% v 13%; P = .41), relapse/progression (37% v 40%; P = .51), progression-free survival (48% v 48%; P = .96), and overall survival (61% v 62%; P = .82) were similar. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference between Haplo-HCT and MSD-HCT in terms of nonrelapse mortality (P = .06), progression/relapse (P = .10), progression-free survival (P = .83), and overall survival (P = .34). Conclusion Haplo-HCT with PT-Cy provides survival outcomes comparable to MSD-HCT, with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据