4.6 Article

Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04778-9

关键词

Gene regulatory networks; Network inference; Imputation; scRNA-seq; Benchmarking; Stochastic simulation

资金

  1. European Union [766069]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [766069] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces Biomodelling.jl, a tool that uses multiscale modeling to generate synthetic scRNA-seq data and evaluate the performance of gene regulatory network inference methods.
Background Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has very rapidly become the new workhorse of modern biology providing an unprecedented global view on cellular diversity and heterogeneity. In particular, the structure of gene-gene expression correlation contains information on the underlying gene regulatory networks. However, interpretation of scRNA-seq data is challenging due to specific experimental error and biases that are unique to this kind of data including drop-out (or technical zeros). Methods To deal with this problem several methods for imputation of zeros for scRNA-seq have been developed. However, it is not clear how these processing steps affect inference of genetic networks from single cell data. Here, we introduce Biomodelling.jl, a tool for generation of synthetic scRNA-seq data using multiscale modelling of stochastic gene regulatory networks in growing and dividing cells. Results Our tool produces realistic transcription data with a known ground truth network topology that can be used to benchmark different approaches for gene regulatory network inference. Using this tool we investigate the impact of different imputation methods on the performance of several network inference algorithms. Conclusions Biomodelling.jl provides a versatile and useful tool for future development and benchmarking of network inference approaches using scRNA-seq data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据