4.6 Article

The influence of multidisciplinary team meetings on treatment decisions in advanced bladder cancer

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 244-252

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15856

关键词

multidisciplinary team meeting; muscle-invasive bladder cancer; treatment advice; curative intent treatment; radical cystectomy hospital; #BladderCancer; #blcsm; #uroonc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the role of specialised genitourinary multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) in decision-making and identified factors that influenced the probability of receiving treatment with curative intent for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study found that age, performance status, and the type of hospital were associated with the likelihood of being discussed in an MDTM and receiving curative treatment. Patient preference was the main reason for non-adherence to treatment advice.
Objectives To investigate the role of specialised genitourinary multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) in decision-making and identify factors that influence the probability of receiving a treatment plan with curative intent for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients and methods Data relating to patients with cT2-4aN0/X-1 M0 urothelial cell carcinoma, diagnosed between November 2017 and October 2019, were selected from the nationwide, population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry ('BlaZIB study'). Curative treatment options were defined as radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation or brachytherapy. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between MDTM factors and curative treatment advice and how this advice was followed. Results Of the 2321 patients, 2048 (88.2%) were discussed in a genitourinary MDTM. Advanced age (>80 years) and poorer World Health Organization performance status (score 1-2 vs 0) were associated with no discussion (P < 0.001). Being discussed was associated with undergoing treatment with curative intent (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-4.9), as was the involvement of a RC hospital (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.09-2.65). Involvement of an academic centre was associated with higher rates of bladder-sparing treatment (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21). Patient preference was the main reason for non-adherence to treatment advice. Conclusions For patients with MIBC, the probability of being discussed in a MDTM was associated with age, performance status and receiving treatment with curative intent, especially if a representative of a RC hospital was present. Future studies should focus on the impact of MDTM advice on survival data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据