4.8 Article

Upstream processes of citrus fruit waste biorefinery for complete valorization

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127776

关键词

Citrus fruit waste; Lignocellulose; Pectin; Extraction; Enzyme saccharification

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture, Science, and Technology Development from the Rural Development Administration of Korea [PJ01577003]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [2022R1I1A1A01072158]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2022R1I1A1A01072158] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in the extraction and enzyme saccharification processes of citrus fruit waste (CW), aiming to improve the economic feasibility of CW biorefinery.
Citrus fruit waste (CW) is a useful biomass and its valorization into fuels and biochemicals has received much attention. For economic feasibility, increased efficiency of the preceding extraction and enzyme saccharification processes is necessary. However, at present, there is a lack of systematic reviews addressing these two integral upstream processes in concert for CW biorefinery. Here, the state-of-the-art advancements in enzyme extraction and saccharification processes-using which relevant essential oils, flavonoids, and sugars can be obtained-are reviewed. Specifically, the extraction options for two commercially available CW-derived products, essential oils and pectin, are discussed. With respect to enzyme saccharification, the use of an undefined commercial mixture routinely results in suboptimal sugar production. In this respect, applicable strategies for enzyme mixture cus-tomization are suggested for maximizing the hydrolytic efficiency of CW. The enzyme degradation system for CW-derived carbohydrates and its extensive application for sugar production are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据