4.5 Article

The physics of liquid-to-solid transitions in multi- domain protein condensates

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 121, 期 14, 页码 2751-2766

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.06.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. [NIH-5RO1EY030444-03]
  2. [NIH-5R35GM139571-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the physical basis of structural diversity in condensed phases of multi-domain RNA-binding proteins using simulations. The results reveal a highly cooperative first-order transition between disordered structures and an ordered phase, as well as the impact of homodomain and heterodomain interactions on the variety of structures.
Many RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that assemble into membraneless organelles have a common architecture including disordered prion-like domain (PLD) and folded RNA-binding domain (RBD). An enrichment of PLD within the condensed phase gives rise to formation, on longer time scales, of amyloid-like fibrils (aging). In this study, we employ coarse-grained Langevin dynamics simulations to explore the physical basis for the structural diversity in condensed phases of multi-domain RBPs. We discovered a highly cooperative first-order transition between disordered structures and an ordered phase whereby chains of PLD organize in fibrils with high nematic orientational order. An interplay between homodomain (PLD-PLD) and heterodomain (PLD-RBD) interactions results in variety of structures with distinct spatial architectures. Interestingly, the different structural phases also exhibit vastly different intracluster dynamics of proteins, with diffusion coefficients 5 times (disordered structures) to 50 times (ordered structures) lower than that of the dilute phase. Cooperativity of this liquid-solid tran-sition makes fibril formation highly malleable to mutations or post-translational modifications. Our results provide a mechanistic understanding of how multi-domain RBPs could form assemblies with distinct structural and material properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据