4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and biological activity evaluation of a series of bardoxolone methyl prodrugs

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105831

关键词

Bardoxolone methyl; Cathepsin B; Polyethylene glycol; Prodrug

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strategy of preparing CDDO-Me prodrugs with CTSB linkers and PEG moieties was reported, aiming to shield the CUK part for improved water solubility and safety. Some prodrugs exhibited promising activities and showed lower potential safety risks compared to CDDO-Me.
Bardoxolone methyl (CDDO-Me) has exhibited positive therapeutic effects in clinical trials for diabetic nephropathy (DN), but serious safety risks in the heart exist because of the potential off-target response resulting from the highly active part of CDDO-Me. Herein, we reported a novel strategy to prepare Cathepsin B (CTSB) cleavable and improved water-soluble prodrugs of CDDO-Me. CTSB linkers connection to the highly active alpha-cyano-alpha, beta-unsaturated ketone (CUK) part of CDDO-Me with the incorporation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) moieties, provided a series of prodrugs of CDDO-Me without CUK part exposure. Theoretically, these prodrugs shielding CUK part can be stably circulated and finally cleaved by CTSB in lysosomes to release CDDO-Me. In this paper, preliminary curative effects and safety of all prodrugs were determined. Wherein, prodrug 20 displayed relatively better activities than other prodrugs in inhibiting the release of NO from RAW264.7 cells, activating Keap1-Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway and inhibiting NF-kappa B signaling pathway, which were comparable to CDDOMe. More importantly, prodrug 20 showed relatively lower human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) inhibitory activity compared with CDDO-Me, which demonstrated prodrug 20 might be safer than CDDO-Me. In conclusion, the novel strategy of shielding CUK part with CTSB linkers provided a new idea for solving the limitations of CDDO-Me in clinical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据