4.7 Article

Effects of polyethylene glycol-20k IV solution on donor management in a canine model of donor brain death

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113293

关键词

Impermeant; Polyethylene-glycol; Organ donation; Neurogenic shock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the use of polyethylene glycol-20k IV solution can effectively resuscitate and support brain dead organ donors, while reducing complications.
Background: Traditionally, vasopressors and crystalloids have been used to stabilize brain dead donors; however, the use of crystalloid is fraught with complications. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a newly developed impermeant solution, polyethylene glycol-20k IV solution (PEG-20k) for resuscitation and support of brain dead organ donors.Methods: Brain death was induced in adult beagle dogs and a set volume of PEG-20k or crystalloid solution was given thereafter. The animals were then resuscitated over 16 h with vasopressors and crystalloid as necessary to maintain mean arterial pressure of 80-100 mmHg. The kidneys were procured and cold-stored for 24 h, after which they were analyzed using the isolated perfused kidney model.Results: The study group required significantly less crystalloid volume and vasopressors while having less urine output and requiring less potassium supplementation than the control group. Though the two groups' mean arterial pressure and lactate levels were comparable, the study group's kidneys showed less preservation injury after short-term reperfusion indexed by decreased lactate dehydrogenase release and higher creatinine clearance than the control group.Conclusions: The use of polyethylene glycol-20k IV solution for resuscitating brain dead donors decreases cell swelling and improves intravascular volume, thereby improving end organ oxygen delivery before procurement and so preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury after transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据