4.7 Review

Targeting appetite and satiety in diabetes and obesity, via G protein-coupled receptors

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115115

关键词

GPCR; Obesity; Diabetes; Appetite; Satiety; Review

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland
  2. NHMRC [APP2012657]
  3. ARC [FT180100543]
  4. Australian Government Research Training Scholarships
  5. Australian Research Council [FT180100543] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes and obesity are global pandemics, with G protein-coupled receptors playing a crucial role in their pathophysiology. However, only a few GPCRs have been approved for treatment, highlighting the importance of further research and drug development targeting these receptors.
Type 2 diabetes and obesity have reached pandemic proportions throughout the world, so much so that the World Health Organisation coined the term Globesity to help encapsulate the magnitude of the problem. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are highly tractable drug targets due to their wide involvement in all aspects of physiology and pathophysiology, indeed, GPCRs are the targets of approximately 30% of the currently approved drugs. GPCRs are also broadly involved in key physiologies that underlie type 2 diabetes and obesity including feeding reward, appetite and satiety, regulation of blood glucose levels, energy homeostasis and adipose function. Despite this, only two GPCRs are the target of approved pharmaceuticals for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In this review we discuss the role of these, and select other candidate GPCRs, involved in various facets of type 2 diabetic or obese pathophysiology, how they might be targeted and the potential reasons why pharmaceuticals against these targets have not progressed to clinical use. Finally, we provide a perspective on the current development pipeline of anti-obesity drugs that target GPCRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据