4.7 Article

Crack detection algorithm for concrete structures based on super-resolution reconstruction and segmentation network

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104346

关键词

Deep learning; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Super-resolution reconstruction; Semantic segmentation; Automatic crack detection; Magnification factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808209, 51778222]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities through the Project of Young Teacher Growth of Hunan University [531118010081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an automatic microcrack detection method based on super-resolution reconstruction and semantic segmentation. By using deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction and semantic segmentation, the accuracy of crack detection and feature quantification is significantly improved.
Crack images collected from civil infrastructures through unmanned aerial vehicles suffer from motion blur and insufficient resolution, which reduces the accuracy of microcrack detection. Therefore, an automatic microcrack detection method based on super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) and semantic segmentation is proposed. Superresolution (SR) images reconstructed by the proposed deep learning-based SRR model were input into the proposed semantic segmentation network for crack segmentation, and the length and width of cracks were measured through an improved medial axis transform approach. The accuracy of crack segmentation and feature quantification for SR images obtained using the deep learning-based SRR is significantly improved compared with low-resolution fuzzy images. The effects of three parameters on the results were analyzed. Compared with the Bicubic testset, the Intersection-over-Union of the SR testset is improved by 17% when a magnification factor of 4 is adopted. The results show that the proposed method achieves good performance in detecting concrete cracks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据