4.7 Review

Blockchain in construction management: Applications, advantages and limitations

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104379

关键词

Artificial intelligence (AI); Blockchain technologies; Building information modeling; Construction and infrastructure; Contractual disputes; Project stakeholders; Review article; Smart contracts

资金

  1. Monash Data Futures Institute (MDFI) grant scheme on AI and Data Science for Monash Global Challenges

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blockchain technology has the potential to overcome limitations in the construction industry by enhancing payment transparency, protecting transaction histories, and improving access to information. It can also prevent disputes arising from communication issues, inaccurate documentation, and payment problems.
Blockchain technology (BCT) has been implemented in different industries, including healthcare, manufacturing and construction. Integrating recent technologies such as the internet of things (IoT), building information modeling (BIM), and artificial intelligence with BCT creates the potential for overcoming many limitations within the construction industry. Blockchain smart contracts, for example, can solve problems related to traditional contract forms. In construction projects, smart contracts based on BCT can enhance payment transparency, protect transaction histories, and provide secure access to information. Since BCT platforms are decentralized, reducing unnecessary bureaucracy will improve open communications, and BCT application can prevent disputes rooted in communication issues, inaccurate documentation, and payment problems. This study focuses on reviewing BCT characteristics to evaluate impacts on mitigating disputes. Based on a systematic review of the publications, a comprehensive classification of blockchain-enabled applications in managing construction disputes is presented. This review identifies gaps in research and opportunities for future studies in the construction domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据