4.7 Article

On Nash-Stackelberg-Nash games under decision-dependent uncertainties: Model and equilibrium

期刊

AUTOMATICA
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110401

关键词

Nash-Stackelberg-Nash game; Decision-dependent uncertainties; Nash equilibrium; Existence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [1966601]
  2. State Grid Corporation of China [1966601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses a class of two-stage hierarchical games with multiple leaders and followers, known as Nash-Stackelberg-Nash (N-S-N) games, under decision-dependent uncertainties (DDUs). By formulating the N-S-N games with DDUs and establishing a rigorous definition for the equilibrium of the game, the existence of the equilibrium of N-S-N games under DDUs is proved using Kakutani's fixed-point theorem. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the impact of DDUs on the equilibrium of N-S-N games.
In this paper, we discuss a class of two-stage hierarchical games with multiple leaders and followers, which is called Nash-Stackelberg-Nash (N-S-N) games. Particularly, we consider N-S-N games under decision-dependent uncertainties (DDUs). DDUs refer to the uncertainties that are affected by the strategies of decision-makers and have been rarely addressed in game equilibrium analysis. In this paper, we first formulate the N-S-N games with DDUs of complete ignorance, where the interactions between the players and DDUs are characterized by uncertainty sets that depend parametrically on the players' strategies. Then, a rigorous definition for the equilibrium of the game is established by consolidating generalized Nash equilibrium and Pareto-Nash equilibrium. Afterward, we prove the existence of the equilibrium of N-S-N games under DDUs by applying Kakutani's fixed-point theorem. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to show the impact of DDUs on the equilibrium of N-S-N games. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据