4.7 Article

Narrowband Searches for Continuous and Long-duration Transient Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars in the LIGO-Virgo Third Observing Run

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 932, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ad0

关键词

Gravitational wave astronomy; Neutron stars; Pulsars

资金

  1. NSF's LIGO Laboratory - National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  3. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  5. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  6. Department of Science and Technology, India
  7. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  8. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  9. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI)
  10. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  11. Ministerio de Universidades, the Conselleria de Fons Europeus, Universitat i Cultura
  12. Direccio General de Politica Universitaria i Recerca del Govern de les Illes Balears
  13. Conselleria d'Innovacio Universitats
  14. Ciencia i Societat Digital de la Generalitat Valenciana
  15. CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
  16. National Science Centre of Poland
  17. European Union-European Regional Development Fund
  18. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  19. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  20. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  21. Russian Science Foundation
  22. European Commission
  23. European Social Funds (ESF)
  24. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  25. Royal Society, the Scottish Funding Council
  26. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  27. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  28. French Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  29. Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRSFNRS)
  30. Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC)
  31. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO), Belgium
  32. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  33. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFIH)
  34. National Research Foundation of Korea
  35. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  36. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  37. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovations
  38. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP-SAIFR)
  39. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  40. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  41. Leverhulme Trust
  42. Research Corporation
  43. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  44. United States Department of Energy
  45. Kavli Foundation
  46. MEXT
  47. JSPS Leading-edge Research Infrastructure Program
  48. JSPS [26000005, 2905: JP17H06358, JP17H06361, JP17H06364, 17H06133, 20H05639, 20A203: JP20H05854]
  49. Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo in Korea
  50. National Research Foundation (NRF) in Korea
  51. Computing Infrastructure Project of KISTI-GSDC in Korea
  52. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI) in Korea
  53. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) in Korea
  54. Academia Sinica (AS) in Taiwan [AS-CDA-105-M06]
  55. AS Grid Center (ASGC) in Taiwan [AS-CDA-105-M06]
  56. Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) in Taiwan [AS-CDA-105-M06]
  57. Advanced Technology Center (ATC) of NAOJ
  58. Mechanical Engineering Center of KEK
  59. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) 2012 Leading Edge Fund [31170]
  60. province of British Columbia
  61. province of Quebec
  62. province of Ontario
  63. CFI 2015 Innovation Fund [33213]
  64. Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of Toronto
  65. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), McGill University
  66. NSERC RTI-1 grant [EQPEQ 458893-2014]
  67. WestGrid
  68. Compute Canada
  69. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [CITA 490888-16]
  70. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  71. UBC Four Year Fellowship [6456]
  72. EPSRC/STFC fellowship [EP/T017325/1]
  73. ANID/FONDECYT [1171421, 1211964]
  74. NASA [80NSSC19K1444, 80NSSC21K0091]
  75. NASA through the NICER mission
  76. NASA through the Astrophysics Explorers Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a coherent search for continuous gravitational waves from eighteen pulsars using data from LIGO and Virgo's third observing run (O3). The study finds no evidence for continuous gravitational waves and sets upper limits on the strain amplitude for each target. The search also examines long-duration transient gravitational waves in the aftermath of pulsar glitches, reporting two marginal outliers but finding no clear evidence for such emission.
Isolated neutron stars that are asymmetric with respect to their spin axis are possible sources of detectable continuous gravitational waves. This paper presents a fully coherent search for such signals from eighteen pulsars in data from LIGO and Virgo's third observing run (O3). For known pulsars, efficient and sensitive matched-filter searches can be carried out if one assumes the gravitational radiation is phase-locked to the electromagnetic emission. In the search presented here, we relax this assumption and allow both the frequency and the time derivative of the frequency of the gravitational waves to vary in a small range around those inferred from electromagnetic observations. We find no evidence for continuous gravitational waves, and set upper limits on the strain amplitude for each target. These limits are more constraining for seven of the targets than the spin-down limit defined by ascribing all rotational energy loss to gravitational radiation. In an additional search, we look in O3 data for long-duration (hours-months) transient gravitational waves in the aftermath of pulsar glitches for six targets with a total of nine glitches. We report two marginal outliers from this search, but find no clear evidence for such emission either. The resulting duration-dependent strain upper limits do not surpass indirect energy constraints for any of these targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据