4.6 Article

Effects of Multimodal Inpatient Rehabilitation vs Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical Recovery After Esophageal Cancer Surgery

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
卷 103, 期 12, 页码 2391-2397

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.019

关键词

Esophageal neoplasms; Exercise; Quality of life; Rehabilitation

资金

  1. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea [2020-0596]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multimodal rehabilitation initiated immediately after esophageal cancer surgery can improve physical recovery, particularly in terms of walking endurance.
Objective: To determine the effects of multimodal rehabilitation initiated immediately after esophageal cancer surgery on physical recovery compared with conventional pulmonary rehabilitation. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Private quaternary care hospital. Participants: Fifty-nine inpatients (N=59) who participated in either conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (n=30) or in multimodal rehabilitation (n=29) after esophageal cancer surgery were included. Interventions: Both groups performed pulmonary exercises, including deep breathing, chest expansion, inspiratory muscle training, coughing, and manual vibration. In the conventional pulmonary rehabilitation group, light-intensity mat exercise, stretching, and walking were performed. The multimodal rehabilitation group performed resistance exercises and moderate- to high-intensity aerobic interval exercises using a bicycle. Main Outcome Measures: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), pain, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second chair stand test, and grip strengths were assessed before and after the rehabilitation programs. Results: Symptom scales of pain, dyspnea, and insomnia in the EORTC QLQ-C30 as well as 6MWT improved significantly after each program (P<.05). 6MWT (73.1 +/- 52.6 vs 28.4 +/- 14.3, P<.001, d=1.15), 30-second chair stand test (3.5 +/- 3.9 vs 0.35 +/- 2.0, P<.001, d=1.06), and left grip strength (1.2 +/- 1.3 vs 0.0 +/- 1.5, P=.002, d=0.42) improved significantly in the multimodal rehabilitation group compared with the pulmonary rehabilitation group. While right grip strength also showed more improvement for those undergoing the multimodal program, the mean strength difference was not clinically meaningful. Conclusions: A multimodal inpatient rehabilitation program instituted early after esophageal cancer surgery improved endurance for walking more than conventional pulmonary rehabilitation as measured by the 6MWT and the 30-second chair stand test. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据