4.7 Article

On the elastic tensors of ultra-thin films: A study of ruthenium

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 592, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153194

关键词

Density Functional Theory; Ruthenium; Ultra thin film; Surfaces; Roughness; Elasticity; Elastic Tensor

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) , Belgium
  2. Flemish Government, Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The critical dimensions of electronic device patterns have been reduced to a few nanometers due to miniaturization. At this scale, the mechanical integrity of thin films deviates from their bulk material values, causing reliability issues. Understanding these fundamental aspects is crucial for technology advancements.
Critical Dimensions (CD) of electronic device patterns have been reduced to the order of a few nanometers due to the extreme miniaturization of devices, setting the thickness of some of its constituting materials at the (sub-)nanometer level. At these length scales, the mechanical integrity of the constituting films begin to deviate strongly from their bulk material values, introducing a set of undesired reliability side-effects such as mechanical failure, delamination, and strain enhanced diffusion. Understanding the fundamentals behind these aspects is critical to further sustain technology developments. We use Density Functional Theory (DFT) to quantify how the mechanical properties of sub-10 nm thick films depend on their thickness and surface roughness, specifically for Ru [001], which is currently being investigated for CMOS interconnects, an antiferromagnetic layer, and an etch stop layer in Magnetic Random Access Memories (MRAM). Our findings underline that overlooking the impact of film dimensions and surface roughness on the mechanical properties at these CDs, hampers the optimization of device performances and challenges the validity of many experimental and modeling techniques relying on the assumption that bulk mechanical properties are preserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据