4.4 Article

Investigation of level density and Gama strength function for photoneutron reaction in medical linacs in Beamline

期刊

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110286

关键词

Photoneutron; Cross; Section; Medical linac head; Level density; Gamma strenght function; EXFOR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photoneutron reaction cross-sections of several isotopes were calculated using the TALYS 1.95 nuclear reaction code. The energy range chosen corresponds to both the giant dipole resonance region and the energy range used in radiotherapy. Different phenomenological level density models were used, and the most suitable model for each reaction was chosen based on relative variance calculations. The calculated data was compared with experimental data, showing reasonable agreement.
Photoneutron reaction cross-sections of Au-197, Re-187, W-186, Ta-181, Mo-94,Mo-95,Mo-96,Mo-97,Mo-98,Mo-100 isotopes were calculated through the TALYS 1.95 nuclear reaction code. The energy range of the incident photon chosen as 7 MeV-30 MeV corresponded to the range of the giant dipole resonance region, which is also an applicable energy range in radiotherapy for many commercial medical linear accelerators. Calculations were performed using three phenomenological level density models available in code, namely the Constant Temperature Fermi Gas Model, the Back-shifted Fermi Gas Model, and the Generalized Superfluid Model. The most convenient level density model for each reaction was chosen using relative variance calculations. The cross-section calculations were repeated using gamma strength function models, Kopecky-Uhl generalized Lorentzian model, Brink-Axel Lorentzian model, and Goriely's hybrid model and the best level density model was kept constant. The calculated data and the experimental data from the international Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Library were analysed and compared graphically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据