Effect of wearing personal protective equipment on acoustic characteristics and speech perception during COVID-19

With the COVID-19 pandemic, the usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) has become 'the new normal'. Both surgical masks and N95 masks with a face shield are widely used in healthcare settings to reduce virus transmission, but the use of these masks has a negative impact on speech perception. Therefore, transparent masks are recommended to solve this dilemma. However, there is a lack of quan-titative studies regarding the effect of PPE on speech perception. This study aims to compare the effect on speech perception of different types of PPE (surgical masks, N95 masks with face shield and transparent masks) in healthcare settings, for listeners with normal hearing in the audiovisual or auditory-only modality. The Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB)-like Mandarin speech stimuli were digitally recorded by a G.R.A.S KEMAR manikin without and with masks (surgical masks, N95 masks with face shield and trans-parent masks). Two variants of video display were created (with or without visual cues) and tagged to the corresponding audio recordings. The speech recording and video were presented to listeners simultane-ously in each of four conditions: unattenuated speech with visual cues (no mask); surgical mask atten-uated speech without visual cues; N95 mask with face shield attenuated speech without visual cues; and transparent mask attenuated speech with visual cues. The signal-to-noise ratio for 50 % correct scores (SNR50) threshold in noise was measured for each condition in the presence of four-talker babble. Twenty-four subjects completed the experiment. Acoustic spectra obtained from all types of masks were primarily attenuated at high frequencies, beyond 3 kHz, but to different extents. The mean SNR50 thresh-olds of the two auditory-only conditions (surgical mask and N95 mask with face shield) were higher than those of the audiovisual conditions (no mask and transparent mask). SNR50 thresholds in the surgical -mask conditions were significantly lower than those for the N95 masks with face shield. No significant difference was observed between the two audiovisual conditions. The results confirm that wearing a sur-gical mask or an N95 mask with face shield has a negative impact on speech perception. However, wear-ing a transparent mask improved speech perception to a similar level as unmasked condition for young normal-hearing listeners. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

With the COVID-19 pandemic, the usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) has become 'the new normal'. Transparent masks are recommended to solve the negative impact on speech perception caused by the use of surgical masks and N95 masks with a face shield. However, there is a lack of quantitative studies regarding the effect of PPE on speech perception. This study aimed to compare the effect on speech perception of different types of PPE (surgical masks, N95 masks with face shield and transparent masks) in healthcare settings, for listeners with normal hearing in the audiovisual or auditory-only modality. The results confirmed that wearing a surgical mask or an N95 mask with face shield has a negative impact on speech perception, but wearing a transparent mask improved speech perception to a similar level as unmasked condition for young normal-hearing listeners.