4.6 Article

Systematic Mapping of Conduction Tissue Regions During Congenital Heart Surgery

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 114, 期 4, 页码 1500-1504

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.040

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL135077, R56 HL128813, R13 HL160044]
  2. Nora Eccles Treadwell Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new technique for identifying regions of conduction tissue in the heart using fiberoptic confocal microscopy. Evaluation of the technique on patients with congenital heart defects revealed substantial variability in the location of the conduction system. The clockface schematics were used to create surgical repair plans based on this variability.
PURPOSE Damage to the cardiac conduction system is a major risk of congenital cardiac surgery. Localization of the conduction system is commonly based on anatomic landmarks, which are variable in congenital heart diseases. We intro-duce a novel technique for identification of conduction tissue regions based on real-time fiberoptic confocal microscopy.DESCRIPTION We developed a fiberoptic confocal microscopy-based technique to document conduction tissue regions and deployed it in pediatric patients undergoing repair of common congenital heart defects. The technique applies clockface schematics for intraoperative documentation of the location of conduction tissue regions.EVALUATION We created clockface schematics for 11 patients with ventricular septal defects, 6 with tetralogy of Fallot, and 10 with atrioventricular canal defects. The approach revealed substantial variability in the location of the conduction system in hearts with congenital defects. The clockface schematics were used to create plans for subsequent surgical repair.CONCLUSIONS The clockface schematic provides a reliable fiducial system to document and communicate variability of conduction tissue regions in the heart and applies this information for decision-making during congenital cardiac surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据