4.7 Article

Unraveling the intestinal epithelial barrier in cyanotoxin microcystin-treated Caco-2 cell monolayers

期刊

ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
卷 1516, 期 1, 页码 188-196

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14870

关键词

actin; apoptosis; claudin; MLCK; PIK; tight junction

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK 2318-2 C1, Schu 559/11-5]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK068271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which microcystin leads to diarrhea. Our results showed that microcystin compromises the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, resulting in increased permeability and diarrhea.
Microcystin is a widespread cyanobacterial toxin that affects the intestine to produce diarrheal symptoms after ingestion of freshwater blue-green algae. Our study aimed to characterize the mechanism by which the toxin leads to diarrhea via epithelial barrier dysfunction in a small intestine Caco-2 cell model. Microcystin-treated human Caco-2 epithelial monolayers were functionally and molecularly analyzed for barrier dysfunction. Tight junctions (TJs) and cell damage were analyzed in relation to transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) changes. TER of microcystin-treated Caco-2 cells was reduced by 65% of the initial value after 24 h; concomitantly, permeability for fluorescein increased 2.6-fold. Western blot analysis showed reduced claudin-1 expression, while expression of claudin-3 and -4 remained unchanged. Super-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy revealed that TJ integrity was compromised by fraying and splitting of the TJ domain of the epithelial cells. Epithelial apoptosis did not significantly contribute to epithelial barrier dysfunction, while cytoskeletal actomyosin constriction was associated with TJ disintegration and the barrier defect. Our results indicate that microcystin causes intestinal barrier leakiness, which helps to explain the leak flux type of diarrhea as the main pathomechanism after ingestion of cyanobacterial toxin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据