4.6 Article

Two phase algorithm for bi-objective relief distribution location problem

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04751-y

关键词

Heuristic; Location problem; NP-hard problem; Relief distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The location planning of relief distribution centres is crucial in humanitarian logistics. This study proposes a two-stage problem to minimize the total cost by determining the minimum number of relief DCs and finding their optimal locations. A novel two-phase algorithm is developed to solve this complex problem and is shown to be more efficient and effective compared to other well-known algorithms.
The location planning of relief distribution centres (DCs) is crucial in humanitarian logistics as it directly influences the disaster response and service to the affected victims. In light of the critical role of facility location in humanitarian logistics planning, the study proposes a two-stage relief distribution location problem. The first stage of the model determines the minimum number of relief DCs, and the second stage find the optimal location of these DCs to minimize the total cost. To address a more realistic situation, restrictions are imposed on the coverage area and capacity of each DCs. In addition, for optimally solving this complex NP-hard problem, a novel two-phase algorithm with exploration and exploitation phase is developed in the paper. The first phase of the algorithm i.e., exploration phase identifies a near-optimal solution while the second phase i.e. exploitation phase enhances the solution quality through a close circular proximity investigation. Furthermore, the comparative analysis of the proposed algorithm with other well-known algorithms such as genetic algorithm, pattern search, fmincon, multistart and hybrid heuristics is also reported and computationally tested from small to large data sets. The results reveal that the proposed two-phase algorithm is more efficient and effective when compared to the conventional metaheuristic methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据