4.8 Review

Microenvironment Engineering for the Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Reaction

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202207252

关键词

Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Reaction; Microenvironment Engineering; Product Selectivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872209, 52072273]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Special Support Program for High-level Talents [2019R52042]
  3. Wenzhou basic scientific research project [2020G0076]
  4. Start-up Fund of Wenzhou University [QD2021152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review extends the discussion of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (eCO2RR) to the microenvironment around the electrocatalytic center and provides a comprehensive overview of recent research progress. The microenvironment is categorized based on the components relevant to electrocatalytic active sites, and the factors affecting the catalytic performance of eCO2RR are discussed. Challenges, potential solutions, and perspectives for future research are also addressed.
Rather than just focusing on the catalyst itself in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (eCO(2)RR), as previously reviewed elsewhere, we herein extend the discussion to the special topic of the microenvironment around the electrocatalytic center and present a comprehensive overview of recent research progress. We categorize the microenvironment based on the components relevant to electrocatalytic active sites, i.e., the catalyst surface, substrate, co-reactants, electrolyte, membrane, and reactor. Supported by most of the reported articles, the relevant factors affecting the catalytic performance of eCO(2)RR are then discussed in detail, and existing challenges and potential solutions are mentioned. Perspectives for the future research on eCO(2)RR, including the integration of different microenvironment factors, the extension to industrial application by coupling with carbon capture and conversion, and separation of products, are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据