4.8 Article

Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of a Rhamnose-Functionalized Bispecific Nanobody as a Bispecific Antibody Mimic for Cancer Immunotherapy

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202208773

关键词

Bispecific Nanobodies; Cancer Immunotherapy; Fc Biological Functions; Rhamnose; Sortase A

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32000904, 22177040]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200601]
  3. 111 Project [111-2-06]
  4. Social Development Key Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2019632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we developed a dual-targeting non-IgG format of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) that can simultaneously target EGFR and HER2 on tumor cells. The BsAbs retained dual-targeting activity and exerted potent anticancer effects through the engagement of endogenous antibodies. The optimized BsAbs also showed improved pharmacokinetics and efficient inhibitory effects against tumor growth. This research provides a general and cost-effective platform for generating new BsAbs for cancer immunotherapy.
Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are next-generation therapeutics for complex cancer treatment. Herein, we developed a dual-targeting non-IgG format of bsAbs by using a bispecific nanobody (bsNb) that can simultaneously target EGFR and HER2 on tumor cells. Site-specific modification of the anti-EGFR-HER2 bsNb was conducted using the rhamnose (Rha) hapten via sortase A-mediated ligation to reconstitute the missing crystallizable fragment (Fc) effector biological functions. Functionally similar to bsAbs, bsNb-Rha conjugates retained dual-targeting activity and exerted potent anticancer effects via the Fc-domain-mediated engagement of endogenous anti-Rha antibodies. Further, an optimized bsNb-Rha conjugate exhibited markedly improved pharmacokinetics and efficient inhibitory effects against xenograft tumor growth in vivo. Our strategy provides a general and cost-effective platform to generate a new bsAb format for cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据