4.8 Article

Mesoporous Polyimide-Linked Covalent Organic Framework with Multiple Redox-Active Sites for High-Performance Cathodic Li Storage

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202207043

关键词

Cathodes; Covalent Organic Frameworks; Hexaazatrinaphthylene; Li-Ion Batteries; Polyarylimides

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [22175020, 21871024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have gained attention as promising cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. However, the capacity of COF electrodes reported so far is still unsatisfactory. In this study, a new two-dimensional polyimide-linked COF, HATN-AQ-COF, was designed and fabricated. It possesses multiple redox-active sites for Li+ ion storage, excellent stability, good conductivity, and a large pore size. The HATN-AQ-COF electrode demonstrates a high reversible capacity, active site utilization, and cycle performance, making it one of the best performers among reported COF electrodes.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are gaining increasing attention as renewable cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. However, COF electrodes reported so far still exhibit unsatisfying capacity due to their limited active site density and insufficient utilization. Herein, a new two-dimensional polyimide-linked COF, HATN-AQ-COF with multiple redox-active sites for storing Li+ ions, was designed and fabricated from a new module of 2,3,8,9,14,15-hexacarboxyl hexaazatrinaphthalene trianhydrides with a 2,6-diaminoanthraquinone linker. HATN-AQ-COF possessing excellent stability, good conductivity, and a large pore size of 3.8 nm enables the stable and fast ion transport. This, in combination with the abundant redox active sites, results in a high reversible capacity of 319 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 C (1 C=358 mA g(-1)) for the HATN-AQ-COF electrode with a high active site utilization of 89 % and good cycle performance, representing one of the best performances among the reported COF electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据