4.8 Article

Comparing the Potential of Helmholtz and Planar NMR Microcoils for Analysis of Intact Biological Samples

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 23, 页码 8523-8532

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01560

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC [ALLRP 549399, ALLRP 555452, RGPIN-2019-04165]
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI)
  4. Krembil Foundation
  5. Government of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy plays a vital role in medical and environmental metabolic research, but studying smaller biological samples is challenging. Microcoil NMR shows great potential for analyzing small samples and improving sensitivity. The study found that the Helmholtz microcoil outperforms the planar coil in analyzing complex biological samples.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has played an integral role in medical and environmental metabolic research. However, smaller biological entities, such as eggs and small tissue samples, are becoming increasingly important to better understand toxicity, biological growth/development, and diseases. Unfortunately, their small sizes make them difficult to study using conventional 5 mm NMR probes due to limited sensitivity. The use of microcoil NMR holds great potential for the analysis of such samples, where the coil can be designed to match the sample size to significantly improve NMR mass sensitivity and the filling factor. Here, we compare the potential of planar and Helmholtz microcoil designs to execute complex experiments for the analysis of intact, mass-limited biological samples. The planar coil offers the advantage of an open access design, potentially allowing flow systems to be incorporated and varying sample sizes to be studied; however, its relatively inhomogeneous B-1 field leads to reduced NMR performance. The Helmholtz microcoil overcomes this drawback with its symmetrical design, improving B-1 homogeneity across the sample but with the caveat that the size and shape of the sample is limited to the spacing between the two parallel coils. The line shape, sensitivity, and RF performance are compared on both coils using standard samples and biological samples. This study found that the Helmholtz microcoil used here considerably outperforms the planar coil in multipulse experiments and has great potential to study complex biological samples in the 50-200 nL range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据