4.7 Article

SERS ?hot spot? enhance-array assay for misfolded SOD1 correlated with white matter lesions and aging

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340163

关键词

White matter lesions; Misfolded SOD1; SERS; Gold nanostars; SERS substrate; Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive and specific method based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technique was proposed for quantitative detection of misfolded SOD1 content in white matter lesions (WMLs). The level of misfolded SOD1 increased with age and the degree of WMLs, suggesting it as a potential blood marker for WMLs and aging. SERS-based gold nanostars have great clinical application potential in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of WMLs.
Misfolding of superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) has been correlated with many neurodegenerative diseases, such as Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis's and Alzheimer's among others. However, it is unclear whether misfolded SOD1 plays a role in another neurodegenerative disease of white matter lesions (WMLs). In this study, a sensitive and specific method based on SERS technique was proposed for quantitative detection of misfolded SOD1 content in WMLs. To fabricate the double antibodysandwich substrates for SERS detection, gold nanostars modified with capture antibody were immobilized on glass substrates to prepare active SERS substrates, and then SERS probes conjugated with a Raman reporter and a specific target antibody were coupled with active SERS substrates. This SERS substrates had been employed for quantitative detection of misfolded SOD1 levels in WMLs and exhibited excellent stability, reliability, and accuracy. Moreover, experimental results indicated that the level of misfolded SOD1 increased with the increase in age and the degree of WMLs. Hence, misfolded SOD1 may be a potential blood marker for WMLs and aging. Meanwhile, SERS-based gold nanostars have great clinical application potential in the screening, diagnosis and treatment of WMLs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据