4.2 Review

Phenotypic continuum between POLE-related recessive disorders: A case report and literature review

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 188, 期 10, 页码 3121-3125

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62908

关键词

exome sequencing; facial dysmorphism; immunodeficiency; livedo; and short stature; intrauterine growth restriction; metaphyseal dysplasia; adrenal hypoplasia congenital; and genital anomalies; POLE; short stature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports two siblings with different variants in the POLE gene, identified through exome sequencing. A review of their phenotypes and available literature suggests that individuals with biallelic pathogenic variants in POLE resulting in partial loss-of-function present with similar symptoms.
POLE is a pleiotropic gene with phenotypic expression of pathogenic variants depending on the type of variant, impact on the protein, and mode of inheritance. Heterozygous missense variants located within the exonuclease domain have been shown to result in polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP) which is characterized by an increased risk for colon polyps and colorectal cancer. Biallelic variants resulting in markedly reduced amounts of normal protein have been reported in two separate recessive pediatric syndromes: facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature as well as intrauterine growth restriction, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenital, and genital anomalies. Here we report two siblings identified to have POLE c.1686 + 32C > G in trans with POLE p.(Glu709*) via exome sequencing. A detailed review of the reported phenotypes in these two siblings and from available literature revealed that individuals with biallelic POLE pathogenic variants resulting in partial loss-of-function present with a similar phenotype: short stature and facial dysmorphism with or without immunodeficiency. These data suggest a phenotypic continuum between the previously reported POLE-related recessive disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据