4.3 Review

Pathology Residency Curricula A Systematic Review of Novel Educational Ventures in the Published Literature

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 331-337

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac069

关键词

Curriculum; Resident; Pathology; Graduate medical education; Needs assessment; Pathology training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review of pathology graduate medical education, focusing on novel educational curricula. It found that there has been an increase in curricular endeavors addressing educational needs that are not commonly taught in traditional residency training. The study highlighted the diversity in teaching methods, implementation, and originating institutions. The lack of meaningful evaluated outcomes and available curricular materials may limit the wider use of such curricula and should be considered by future pathology educators.
Objectives To perform a systematic review of the published literature on pathology graduate medical education, with a focus on novel educational curricula. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases for relevant articles published between 2000 and 2021. Results We analyzed 612 articles and selected 19 peer-reviewed, full-length, English language articles published between 2003 and 2021 describing unique curricula for final review. Details on the general characteristics, conceptualization, design, implementation, and assessment were collected and discussed. Conclusions This systematic review highlights a recent increase in published curricular endeavors specifically addressing topics of educational need that are otherwise not commonly taught in traditional residency training. Curricula are diverse in their teaching methods, implementation, and originating institutions. The lack of meaningful evaluated outcomes and available curricular materials may hinder wider use of such curricula; these should be considered by future pathology educators undertaking their design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据